Frightened Ecuadoreans Run Away from Accountability as Caducidad, State Thefts, Rampant Unaccountability and Auto Golpe [and the OAS] all Boost Correa's new Narcostate of Ecuador
Posted by The Editors of Ecrisis at 4/11/2008 5:31 PM and is filed under Communism,OAS,Soros,United States,Terrorism,Venezuela,Ecuador,Mexico,Colombia,Comunismo 
April 18, 2008 To anyone except the OAS's Insulza and U.S. ambassador Linda Jewell's backers from the Soros pro drugs contingent of liars, ninnyhammers, dimwits and dunces, also called paid propagandists, Rafael Correa of Ecuador is an illegally elected cartel boss who has run Ecuador to ground in less than one year and now sits firmly a top his new empire: a narcostate where no one is safe, businesses are fleeing and la nerviosa reigns supreme. Today Correa is trying to "convert" Mexico's Calderon to the dark side, also called Chavez's cartel of neo Marxists.
For his part, Insulza lied before the U.S. Congress on April 10, 2008 to aid and abet Hugo Chavez and Rafael Correa by refusing to consider the facts about the FARC, refused to deem the FARC a terror group [ when it is], and denying any forensic accountability of what the FARC are doing and paying for and vice versa in Ecuador and Venezuela. The U.S. Democrats gave him full sway to let loose his wide eyed lies and even to hold forth with the hyperkinetic pro Chavez media outside the House Foreign Relations hearing room. Insulza whined that the USA's Republicans had no clue as to the facts about the OAS, Insulza's goals and were in essence, he said idiots. We at ECrisis denounce Insulza's inflammatory words against truth seekers because Insulza himself came knowingly and flanked by two very good pro Chavez propagandists named Julia Sweig and Michael Shifter to proclaim that no facts, no science, no military or police record and no forensic accounts about the FARC by the USA and Colombia matter at all. Insulza played his trump card again to tell the public that politics- his special brand of the politics of ignoring the facts, promoting hatred against the USA and Colombia, and his paid talents to promote legalizing undemocratic and illicit regimes in Latin America is paramount.
The NATIONAL REVIEW put the U.S. Democrat position better, "Colombia is our closest ally in Latin America. President Uribe’s embrace of free markets stands in stark contrast to the socialist authoritarianism Hugo Chavez is trying to spread throughout the region. We should be rewarding such an ally, not punishing him. If congressional Democrats vote to kill the U.S.-Colombia Free-Trade Agreement, they will be weakening both the U.S. economy and Uribe — while doing Chavez a huge favor in the process." To be sure, 19 out of 31 OAS member nations are busily jumping in to bed with the depraved world of Chavez, heralded by Insulza's favorite "statesman" Soros, to craft a hemisphere wide narcozone. Soros soothes that his new pet rock Barack Hussein Obama will do everything he wants him to. Certainly the U.S. Democrats in the US Congress are already jumping when the jumps are needed. What we ask is the cost-benefit analysis of aiding and abetting the Chavez-Correa-FARC betterment plan by USA's Democrats and the pro FARC enrichment schemes?
The U.S. Democrats knew what Insulza was going to do before hand and conspired with the OAS to present an unholy round of lairs, ninnyhammers, dimwits and dunces before the U.S. Congress. The fix was in on April 10, 2008 and the U.S. Democrats knew well that while this so called Foreign Relations Hearing, also called lies and propaganda, was going down, Speaker Nancy Pelosi was preparing to deliver the coup de grace against Colombia by killing its free trade deal with the USA, fresh from lying to Colombia's ambassador and plenipotentiary in Washington by soothingly telling her that even though the Sorosites leading the attacks on Colombia were indeed honest statesmen and meant no harm to Colombia's sovereign state and its right to defend itself from terrorists and criminal cartels, the U.S. Democrats would prefer to kill Colombia and return its now first rate nation to a failed narcostate. Thus, the world saw the power of the dishonest, also called "populists" to rig, conjure and conspire to present lies and non facts about remarkably sensitive global matters, which also happen to denounce standard law and order concerns.
INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY has this to say about U.S. Speaker Pelosi's pretense at governing, "Congress: The cowardly start more wars than the courageous. Nancy Pelosi's craven altering of House rules to kill off Colombia's trade pact brings that danger to the Andes. If war breaks out, her name will be on it. April 10 may end up as a date which will live in infamy. The Speaker of the House not only refused to step forward and be counted on approving the vital Colombia free-trade agreement, she ran away from letting anyone else vote on it...Encircled by tanks not only in the East by Venezuela but also in the South by Chavez's cat's paw, Ecuador, Colombia asked the U.S. for just one thing: to pass the free-trade agreement. No tanks. No jets. Just free trade."
To North Americans, the U.S. Congress is almost sacrosanct. However, today's crop of dishonest U.S. Democrats spend more time defending and promoting the Hugo Chavez slimy, manipulative world view of monopolistic criminal cartels and are completely beholden to paid lobbyists who overwhelm Democratic staff offices and commandeer the highest plateaus of Congressional power because Nancy Pelosi has installed her own paid staffers who are also on line with the George Soros groups, come from that realm, and conspire daily to prevent the advancement of law and order, necessary for democracy, in Latin America, preferring as they do to install narcostates where once democracy had a toe hold.
But Insulza told the world yesterday that there exists no proof that Chavez and Correa are in bed with the FARC when anyone with eyes to see and ears to see know well that Chavez and the FARC are in bed with the FARC. Miguel Insulza is on record for this, " `Do you mean if Venezuela is supporting terrorist groups? I do not think so' replied Insulza, who added that there are no proofs of that. `There are no evidences (of this), and no country in the organization, including the US, has submitted proofs of that to OAS,' he said."
Insulza claims that there are no proofs/no facts/no forensics on the Chavez=Correa-FARC combined supports because Insulza relies only on his own non-forensic/non fact based analysis specifically pre rigged to prevent any facts/any knowledge/any data. Insulza wants and now has control over the facts by substitution his own personal political- that is fake data- spread for promoting the legitimizing the illegitimate in South America. Insulza thinks this makes him popular. And indeed it does with every illicit and snaky actor who sells us all the immoral notion that nations are best served with dishonest propaganda and no accountability. Miguel Insulza is not honest, he is not serious and he needs to be fired.
The U.S. Democratic party- that is the pro narcozone contractors of the U.S. Democratic Party- want Insulza to lie a lot to the world. No sooner did the FARC computers become known than the U.S. Democrats and the OAS and the pro drugs Soros groups instantly teamed to lay out their two month strategy to defend Correa and Chavez from criminal prosecution by any and their preferred demands that Miguel Insulza politically controls the non-truth telling to aid and abet the FARC, Correa and Chavez.
The MIAMI HERALD, read it here, reports that before jetting off to try to turn Mexico's Calderon to the dark side, Correa summarily ousted any high military officials whom he suspected might be even remotely concerned about standard law and order and defense. This purge was called "necessary" by Correa. We call it one more nail in the coffin of Andean democracy.
To be sure, Colombia's stock exchange took a serious hit yesterday. Do you wonder who was betting against their exchange, based on privy insider information that Nancy Pelosi would waltz in to the US Congress and demand a vote to change the long standing rules of operations of the US Congress...just to create harm against Colombia? Who indeed benefited from her jiggered insider information.?? Can you spell racketeering?
-Pedro Camargo for ECrisis
For his part, Insulza lied before the U.S. Congress on April 10, 2008 to aid and abet Hugo Chavez and Rafael Correa by refusing to consider the facts about the FARC, refused to deem the FARC a terror group [ when it is], and denying any forensic accountability of what the FARC are doing and paying for and vice versa in Ecuador and Venezuela. The U.S. Democrats gave him full sway to let loose his wide eyed lies and even to hold forth with the hyperkinetic pro Chavez media outside the House Foreign Relations hearing room. Insulza whined that the USA's Republicans had no clue as to the facts about the OAS, Insulza's goals and were in essence, he said idiots. We at ECrisis denounce Insulza's inflammatory words against truth seekers because Insulza himself came knowingly and flanked by two very good pro Chavez propagandists named Julia Sweig and Michael Shifter to proclaim that no facts, no science, no military or police record and no forensic accounts about the FARC by the USA and Colombia matter at all. Insulza played his trump card again to tell the public that politics- his special brand of the politics of ignoring the facts, promoting hatred against the USA and Colombia, and his paid talents to promote legalizing undemocratic and illicit regimes in Latin America is paramount.
The NATIONAL REVIEW put the U.S. Democrat position better, "Colombia is our closest ally in Latin America. President Uribe’s embrace of free markets stands in stark contrast to the socialist authoritarianism Hugo Chavez is trying to spread throughout the region. We should be rewarding such an ally, not punishing him. If congressional Democrats vote to kill the U.S.-Colombia Free-Trade Agreement, they will be weakening both the U.S. economy and Uribe — while doing Chavez a huge favor in the process." To be sure, 19 out of 31 OAS member nations are busily jumping in to bed with the depraved world of Chavez, heralded by Insulza's favorite "statesman" Soros, to craft a hemisphere wide narcozone. Soros soothes that his new pet rock Barack Hussein Obama will do everything he wants him to. Certainly the U.S. Democrats in the US Congress are already jumping when the jumps are needed. What we ask is the cost-benefit analysis of aiding and abetting the Chavez-Correa-FARC betterment plan by USA's Democrats and the pro FARC enrichment schemes?
The U.S. Democrats knew what Insulza was going to do before hand and conspired with the OAS to present an unholy round of lairs, ninnyhammers, dimwits and dunces before the U.S. Congress. The fix was in on April 10, 2008 and the U.S. Democrats knew well that while this so called Foreign Relations Hearing, also called lies and propaganda, was going down, Speaker Nancy Pelosi was preparing to deliver the coup de grace against Colombia by killing its free trade deal with the USA, fresh from lying to Colombia's ambassador and plenipotentiary in Washington by soothingly telling her that even though the Sorosites leading the attacks on Colombia were indeed honest statesmen and meant no harm to Colombia's sovereign state and its right to defend itself from terrorists and criminal cartels, the U.S. Democrats would prefer to kill Colombia and return its now first rate nation to a failed narcostate. Thus, the world saw the power of the dishonest, also called "populists" to rig, conjure and conspire to present lies and non facts about remarkably sensitive global matters, which also happen to denounce standard law and order concerns.
INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY has this to say about U.S. Speaker Pelosi's pretense at governing, "Congress: The cowardly start more wars than the courageous. Nancy Pelosi's craven altering of House rules to kill off Colombia's trade pact brings that danger to the Andes. If war breaks out, her name will be on it. April 10 may end up as a date which will live in infamy. The Speaker of the House not only refused to step forward and be counted on approving the vital Colombia free-trade agreement, she ran away from letting anyone else vote on it...Encircled by tanks not only in the East by Venezuela but also in the South by Chavez's cat's paw, Ecuador, Colombia asked the U.S. for just one thing: to pass the free-trade agreement. No tanks. No jets. Just free trade."
To North Americans, the U.S. Congress is almost sacrosanct. However, today's crop of dishonest U.S. Democrats spend more time defending and promoting the Hugo Chavez slimy, manipulative world view of monopolistic criminal cartels and are completely beholden to paid lobbyists who overwhelm Democratic staff offices and commandeer the highest plateaus of Congressional power because Nancy Pelosi has installed her own paid staffers who are also on line with the George Soros groups, come from that realm, and conspire daily to prevent the advancement of law and order, necessary for democracy, in Latin America, preferring as they do to install narcostates where once democracy had a toe hold.
But Insulza told the world yesterday that there exists no proof that Chavez and Correa are in bed with the FARC when anyone with eyes to see and ears to see know well that Chavez and the FARC are in bed with the FARC. Miguel Insulza is on record for this, " `Do you mean if Venezuela is supporting terrorist groups? I do not think so' replied Insulza, who added that there are no proofs of that. `There are no evidences (of this), and no country in the organization, including the US, has submitted proofs of that to OAS,' he said."
Insulza claims that there are no proofs/no facts/no forensics on the Chavez=Correa-FARC combined supports because Insulza relies only on his own non-forensic/non fact based analysis specifically pre rigged to prevent any facts/any knowledge/any data. Insulza wants and now has control over the facts by substitution his own personal political- that is fake data- spread for promoting the legitimizing the illegitimate in South America. Insulza thinks this makes him popular. And indeed it does with every illicit and snaky actor who sells us all the immoral notion that nations are best served with dishonest propaganda and no accountability. Miguel Insulza is not honest, he is not serious and he needs to be fired.
The U.S. Democratic party- that is the pro narcozone contractors of the U.S. Democratic Party- want Insulza to lie a lot to the world. No sooner did the FARC computers become known than the U.S. Democrats and the OAS and the pro drugs Soros groups instantly teamed to lay out their two month strategy to defend Correa and Chavez from criminal prosecution by any and their preferred demands that Miguel Insulza politically controls the non-truth telling to aid and abet the FARC, Correa and Chavez.
The MIAMI HERALD, read it here, reports that before jetting off to try to turn Mexico's Calderon to the dark side, Correa summarily ousted any high military officials whom he suspected might be even remotely concerned about standard law and order and defense. This purge was called "necessary" by Correa. We call it one more nail in the coffin of Andean democracy.
To be sure, Colombia's stock exchange took a serious hit yesterday. Do you wonder who was betting against their exchange, based on privy insider information that Nancy Pelosi would waltz in to the US Congress and demand a vote to change the long standing rules of operations of the US Congress...just to create harm against Colombia? Who indeed benefited from her jiggered insider information.?? Can you spell racketeering?
-Pedro Camargo for ECrisis
Comments