October 27, 2008  ECrisis is awash with comments about the upcoming U.S. presidential election and the overwhelming evidence of voter registration fraud, a likely one billion in campaign monies raised by the U.S. democratic party's (DNC) Obama and the end of the United States' structural separation of powers under a united socialist tipped DNC. This is beyond....what do they call it-? worrisome "populism." We can only share the facts and the facts show a rifling of premeditated frauds and cover ups to enhance Barack Hussein Obama's take over of Western civilization, which he neither respects nor understands but like every undereducated Ecuadorean Mama seeks to manipulate. This form of non ethics always will get one in to trouble.
 
The NATIONAL REVIEW recently noted, " In Europe, lavish social-democratic government has transformed citizens into eternal wards of the nanny state: the bureaucracy’s assumption of every adult responsibility has severed Continentals from the most basic survival impulse, to the point where unaffordable entitlements on shriveled birth rates have put a question mark over some of the oldest nation states on earth. A vote for an Obama-Pelosi-Barney Frank-ACORN supermajority is a vote for a Europeanized domestic policy that is, as the eco-types like to say, `unsustainable'."

We ask again: who stands for the hard work to sustain Western Civilization's highest achievements? Certainly not the Cuban-Chavez-Correa school curricula.
 
Here is another recent NATIONAL REVIEW analysis:  
"Obama's entire campaign is built on class warfare and human envy. The "change" he peddles is not new. We've seen it before. It is change that diminishes individual liberty for the soft authoritarianism of socialism. It is a populist appeal that disguises government mandated wealth redistribution as tax cuts for the middle class, falsely blames capitalism for the social policies and government corruption (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) that led to the current turmoil in our financial markets, fuels contempt for commerce and trade by stigmatizing those who run successful small and large businesses, and exploits human imperfection as a justification for a massive expansion of centralized government. Rather than pursue the American Dream, he insists that the American Dream has arbitrary limits; Obama would set for the rest of us — today it's $250,000 for businesses and even less for individuals. If the individual dares to succeed beyond the limits set by Obama, he is punished for he's now officially "rich." The value of his physical and intellectual labor must be confiscated in greater amounts for the good of the proletariat (the middle class). And so it is that the middle class, the birth-child of capitalism, is both celebrated and enslaved — for its own good and the greater good. The 'hope' Obama represents, therefore, is not hope at all. It is the misery of his utopianism imposed on the individual. Unlike past Democrat presidential candidates, Obama is a hardened ideologue. He's not interested in playing around the edges. He seeks `fundamental change,' i.e., to remake society. And if the Democrats control Congress with super-majorities led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, he will get much of what he demands." 

ECrisis firmly states- repeatedly- that false hope from dishonest manipulative statist dictatorships, controls and socialist manipulations is not freedom and is in fact in direct opposition to God's given gifts of liberty. Ecuadoreans irresponsibly and with great self-destructive behaviors, tell us that there is no way to be honest any more and no way out of the gilded cage their Mamas have prepared for them to dishonestly keep one and all under house arrest of liars and for liars. We disagree with this end-of-honesty-situation. Open the cage door and fly- now- and tell the truth. It is a refreshing place to begin.
 
Here is William Blake's vision of the only measure of our days...not a dishonest civilization based on envy, greed, manipulation and fake democracy:


                                                           
Nowhere do we see this dishonest agenda than in today's assault on sensibility in the USA. With grim prurient attention, every evil dictator on this planet is cheering for Barack Hussein Obama....and like Hugo Chavez, making crude jokes about John McCain and Sarah Palin, his running mate.

Today's FRONT PAGE runs a new piece on the politics of hatred, currently bankrolled for self satisfaction and money-making-from- instability-which-always-jiggers-self enrichment-on the speculative-market, George Soros, who has plowed billions in to selling the benefits of hatred to improve the politics of global socialists, notes: “While ironic, it is not surprising that hatred of political opponents is so virulent on the left. Hatred has long been a central pillar of leftist ideologies, premised as they are on trampling individual rights for the sake of a collectivist plan. Karl Marx boasted that he was “the greatest hater of the so-called positive.” In 1923, V.I. Lenin chillingly declared to the Soviet Commissars of Education, `We must teach our children to hate. Hatred is the basis of communism.' In his tract “Left-Wing Communism,” Lenin went so far as to assert that hatred was `the basis of every socialist and Communist movement.' Indeed, it is easy to see the thread of hatred running through the various illiberal regimes of history, whether Soviet or Chinese communism or Hitler’s national socialism. Only hatred could explain the willingness to kill, enslave, and rob vast numbers of innocent human beings. Hatred corrodes one’s conscience. Under its toxic influence, a person will regard man’s God-given right to be secure in his life, liberty, and property as nuisances to be overcome, not commandments to be obeyed. The flip side of hatred is an inflated self-love, self-importance, and self-righteousness so extreme that respect for other human beings diminishes and, in extreme cases (Stalin, Mao, Castro, Kim, et al.), disappears." 

We agree: hatred is the basis for communism. Hatred is propagandized as an ethic by Soros, whose own paid actors crawl all over the Andes today, in and out of what is left of the U.S. embassies, themselves zones of dishonesty and fake reporting systems. But single handedly, Ecuador has its own new communism by constitution under its new dictator Correa because Ecuadoreans are taught from birth the joys of hatred. Ecuadorean Mamas also improperly teach their children that manipulation is the highest skill that each can have and hold. In fact Ecuadoreans today are so addicted to manipulating that their track record reveals a massive self centeredness/selfishness, also called societal narcissism which is a direct cut to the humane notion that the commonweal is to be considered constantly.

The best antidote to communism and its benign title, global socialism under the UN plan, is to be honest and selflessly act with honor. But Ecuadoreans preach the gospel that money alone and selfish interests matter and that true Christian charity is to be laughed at. This is repulsive and makes Ecuadoreans look like this money headed "owner of the U.S. Democratic Party" and certainly owner of Barack Hussein Obama's very soul:                  

The Washington Times 
RAHN: You lose, Soros wins
Richard Rahn
Friday, October 24, 2008 


 
Have you ever wondered why billionaires like George Soros financially support politicians who say they will "increase taxes on the rich"?

The answer quite simply is that the tax increases are most often put on people trying to become rich, not those already rich. Hence, the rich, big government advocates can gain far more by "buying" the politicians. The "bought" politicians then provide them with confidential information about administrative decisions, which these donors then use to place big bets in the market, making themselves much richer. If you have deep financial pockets and inside information, you can make huge amounts of money when markets drop.

Mr. Soros, the Democrats' financial angel, is often referred to as the "man who broke the bank of England" in the 1992 Sterling crisis. During that episode, he made $1 billion in one day at the expense of British taxpayers. The relevant question is, did Mr. Soros bet a couple of billion dollars on mere guesses of what the German, French and British officials would do, or did he have inside information?

A member of the British Parliament, who was a close adviser to the British chancellor at the time, told me he believes "Soros was acting on insider information obtained from the French central bank and the German Bundesbank." The insider information was that they would not support the British pound, despite a pre-existing arrangement to do so. Others familiar with the situation have made similar charges.

Given that Mr. Soros is no fool, the British believe it is highly doubtful he would have made such a colossal bet without knowing with great certainty that the Germans would not reduce their interest rate.

Mr. Soros has a reputation for trading on confidential information obtained from political sources. For instance, he was convicted by a French court of having insider knowledge about a takeover attempt of a major French bank. His conviction was upheld in 2006, and he had to pay a multimillion-dollar fine.

The hypocrisy of George Soros is often noted. He is a man who voices many left-wing and even socialist ideas and has been a major critic of the United States for years. Yet, his actions in his own financial interest, using highly questionable tactics and insider information, have made him billions. His modus operandi is to do political favors for left-wing politicians and then use them for his own advantage.

For example, he gained influence with left-wing forces in the United Nations and with anti-U.S. groups by paying for a $10 million townhouse for Mark Malloch-Brown (now a lord and a U.K. Foreign Office minister) to use as the latter's home. Baron Malloch-Brown was former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan's deputy and spent much time voicing Mr. Soros' anti-American statements. Capital Research Center has done extensive reporting on the activities of George Soros (www.capitalresearch.org).

Mr. Soros is often referred to as the man who owns the Democratic Party because of his huge contributions to party committees and individual politicians. It is known that many of his Wall Street friends have been major donors to key Democratic committee chairmen and members in the House and Senate.

As recently as this past spring, House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, Massachusetts Democrat, and Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee chairman Chris Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, were claiming both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (for which they had oversight responsibility) were fiscally sound and needed no additional regulation. At the same time, many independent financial experts were sounding the alarm about these two government-sponsored behemoths.

It would be in the public interest to know which members of the Democratic leadership, members of Congress, and their financial contributors were selling shares of (or shorting) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this year, and of other financial institutions overseen by the congressional Democrats. (Note: In the private sector, if someone with insider knowledge - as Mr. Frank and Mr. Dodd had access to - makes misrepresentations about the health of a company, that person is subject to criminal penalties.) The press should demand full disclosure before Election Day, given the hundreds of billions of dollars the misrepresentations by Messrs. Frank, Dodd, etc. are costing taxpayers.

Note that the Bush administration's ill-thought-out "bailout" scheme was both greatly altered and then endorsed by the congressional Democrats, in part, it appears, because it will give even more opportunities for profit-making by Democratic financial supporters. The forced, partial (and probably unconstitutional) nationalization of the big banks by the seemingly unprincipled Bush Treasury will provide many opportunities for self-dealing politicians and their financial supporters when it comes time to sell the government stakes.

Those who bet against the foolish policies and actions of governments provide a public service by exposing the stupidity, provided they are not using inside information given them from politicians and other government officials. But when people like George Soros and other big financial backers of politicians use confidential inside information or their ability to manipulate the political class for their own ends, it hurts everyone else. The larger the government and the more discretion government officials have regarding issues that can damage or benefit private parties, the more opportunities there will be for abuse and corruption.

If Barack Obama wins with big Democrat majorities in the House and Senate, you know from their statements that they will increase capital gains and business taxes. But they have already said, there "will be exceptions," - which will be worth billions of dollars to those with prior knowledge of what the exceptions will be. Who do you think will have that prior knowledge?

We at ECrisis note that this article explains that Soros will commandeer a self enriching cartel, just as Chavez does in the Andes, for his group of dirty money movers alone who despise functional transparency and loathe what Soros loathes- the Judeo Christian ethic which he has repeatedly called irrelevant. Soros is often called "the Owner of the U.S. Democratic Party" and functionally speaking - that is true. Of course no one man controls all of anything but Soros has spent serious billions to grow his particularly self enriching web of agents, actors and politicians....in motion now. And soon Soros will own more bank stocks than before and will oversee his Obama regime in Washington if the polls are correct today. However, John McCain still has a tiny chance of winning and were the election held in December, he would soundly win. Trust in the USA is today soundly dying, being replaced by the untrustworthy ethics of greed and dishonor.

Today's TIMES of London writes that banks, like governments used to be run not on the Lebanese ethic of manipulative living but on trust, "The bank manager then occupied a similar position to the family solicitor or the family doctor. He hoped to maintain a long-term relationship with each client and he hoped that this relationship would survive for generations. He would offer general financial advice, and was concerned to keep the interest of the client and the bank in alignment. He did not lend the bank's money to people he thought might be unable to repay it....The decline of moral responsibility has damaged... banks; it is the real flaw behind the credit crisis."

Would you go to a doctor who holds the same ethical commitment as Hugo Chavez, Rafael Correa or George Soros whose sole intent is to sell hatred for political gain and jigger what little remains of law and order....for profit? Why entrust your body or your wallet to dishonest, manipulative people? More importantly, how can there be anyone left that you can trust when your own schools, families and religious institutions preach the same mantra that killed Lebanon: manipulate, manipulate, manipulate for self enrichment and laugh at anyone who tries to be honest? This gets you....untrustworthy government and specialists. Today, manipulative Ecuadoreans trust no one because they have created this non trust. If they can afford it, they put their money in US banks or offshore accounts and rely on American doctors because most Ecuadoreans today are so easily manipulated, as they have been trained by their cheerleading Madres, to never tell you the facts in general. One day soon, Ecuadoreans will not be able to buy what they denied their own nation: integrity of others. Far better to start reinserting home grown integrity and abandon this repulsive Lebanese-style suicidal endgame where all is dishonest and nothing holds respect. Lebanon is a failed state and so too now is Ecuador.

-Pedro Camargo for ECrisis